I agree with one thing. Sometimes, public places are the only places these people can smoke, so back off. Based on two realistic factors including the health affection and the environment pollution that directly relate to the community, it is supposed that smoking should be banned in public places. The cigarette is a small but deadly habit enjoyed.3 million Americans.
Please cast your vote after you ve read the arguments.
You can also add to the debate by leaving a comment at the end of the page.
As more cities consider bans on smoking in public places, Kentucky, as one of the heavier tobacco-using states, will undoubtedly continue to debate the pros and cons of this issue with considerable fervor.
Smokers and non-smokers meet at many places like offices, buses, hotels, etc. This article is a kind of major Themes in The Scarlet Letter God, Sin and Guilt sample argumentative essay on the topic Smoking in Public Places Should be Banned. In many cities, carbon monoxide from car emissions is the far more prevalent and similarly toxic air pollutant, yet nobody has proposed a blanket ban on cars. The risk of getting cancer or something else from smoking, is about as high as crashing your car. If you don't like that they allow smoking there don't go or leave. The negative effects of second-hand smoke are scientifically documented and provide a valid reason for banning all public smoking. The person who smokes is active and other who are near to him and inhale the smoke are passive smokers. The headwaiter calls their name and they flick the cancer stick away its not their problem, right? While the goals of smoking ban advocates are well-intentioned, simply outlawing behavior has never been the most effective strategy for getting people to quit their stubborn addictions.